Strategic Manure
by Charley Reese
April 5, 2008
Sen. John McCain is already
spreading the old "strategic interests" fertilizer along the presidential
campaign trail while pretending to be an expert.
Let's hope he really can
explain what interests require us to maintain troops in Germany and Japan 63
years after the end of the war. What exactly is the purpose of those troops? Are
we expecting the Mongols to descend on Japan? Does he expect the Cossacks will
ride across the plains to attack Europe? Does he think that two of the greatest
economic powers on Earth – Japan and Europe – are too poor to defend themselves?
The old boy is living in the past.
When American politicians
talk about strategic interests, they are talking about just what I called it,
manure. We have no strategic interests in the Middle East whatsoever. We wish to
buy oil there. Last time I checked, those countries that produce oil were
selling it to any country willing to buy it, whether that country had troops in
the area or not. Since oil isn't edible, there's not a heck of a lot you can do
with it if you don't sell it.
What are all those Navy
ships in the Persian Gulf doing? Do McCain and George Bush seriously believe
that Iran would launch an invasion of Saudi Arabia? That's ridiculous. There
might be some aspects of Iran's government we don't care for, and that's OK,
because it is not our government and we don't have to live under it. Nobody in
his right mind, however, has ever accused Iran of being an expansionist nation.
All McCain has to do is read up on his history and ask the CIA to explain to him
Iran's order of battle. Their forces are not equipped for invasions.
As for the nuclear
nonsense, both Iran and our own intelligence agencies say that the Iranians are
not interested in developing nuclear weapons. But suppose they were. Who cares?
I'm much more concerned about the nuclear weapons in Russia, China, India,
Pakistan, France, Great Britain, the U.S. and Israel.
Iran is one of the oldest
civilizations on Earth, and its people are smart. They are not crazy. They know
that one day their oil will run out, and they want to develop nuclear power.
They signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. They have called repeatedly
for a nuclear-free Middle East. To compete with the nuclear powers, they'd have
to produce so many nuclear weapons and delivery systems, it would bankrupt them.
They've decided that option would be foolish. Now if they can only convince our
foolish politicians.
I sometimes think our older
politicians fell in love with the British Empire. I think many of them secretly
long to sit on a veranda somewhere and be served drinks by humble servants. They
love the idea of empire. The admirals and generals like to fly around to our 702
overseas bases, play a little golf, have a few drinks and fly home again.
The reality is that we can
no longer afford our overseas empire, no matter what strategic interests McCain
and Bush like to fantasize about. We're about to go busted. It's pretty hard to
maintain an empire on credit when you have borrowed money from the people you
claim to be lording it over. The Philippines kicked us out of our bases there. I
predict the Japanese will eventually do the same. Get a stable government in
North Korea and the South Koreans will be showing us the door. We should leave
on our own and devote those billions of dollars to domestic priorities.
Bush is mad to push the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It
should be disbanded, not expanded. It has no enemy. By expanding it, however,
Bush seems to be trying to convince Russia that NATO is its enemy. That's not a
smart thing to do. It's dumb. Talk about something that is not in our strategic
interests, it's restarting the Cold War with Russia.
Untitled
| When honest people who hold strong opinions come together, it is natural that they state their opinions, and that those opinions occasionally clash. The articles that you see on this website represent the opinion of the writers, and are not the official opinion of this party. To see the official party position on any question, the reader is referred to the Party Platform. |
|
Permission to reprint/republish granted, as long as you include the name of our site, the author,and our URL. www.cptexas.org. All CP Texas reports, and all editorials are property of The Constitution Party of Texas © 2008 (unless otherwise noted).
Untitled