Constitution Party of Texas
   
 Return Home
 Party Info
 National Platform
 State Platform
 Latest News
 Support the Party
 Candidates for Office
 Legislative
 Renew Membership
 Join the Discussion
 Campaign Materials
 Local Contact
 Calendar
 Are you a Terrorist?
 Audio Clips
 Links
United States
The US Constitution
The Declaration of Independence
Federalist Papers
Anti-Federalist Papers
Other Founding Documents
After you read the article below by Chuck Baldwin, ask yourself the question, "Why aren't more Christians applying the standard that Jesus Christ Himself gave to distinguish 'wolves' from 'sheep' : "Ye shall know them by their fruits" (Matt. 7:16) ? Because many Christians once again seem to want to "out-do" their Savior, and be "nicer than Jesus," they are failing to obey their Savior by failing to judge with righteousness judgment (John 7:24).

The failure of the majority of Christians to judge rightly the fruit of George W. Bush is taking us down the path of global socialism and the new world order spoken of repeatedly by his father, former President George H.W. Bush, Sr. during the period of the Gulf War:

September 11, 1990 televised address:
"Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective - a new world order - can emerge... We are now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders"

January 7, 1991 interview in U.S. News & World Report:
"I think that what's at stake here is the new world order. What's at stake here is whether we can have disputes peacefully resolved in the future by a reinvigorated United Nations."

January 9, 1991 press conference:
"[The Gulf crisis] has to do with a new world order. And that new world order is only going to be enhanced if this newly activated peacekeeping function of the United Nations proves to be effective."

January 16, 1991 televised address:
"When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations canuse its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders."

August 1991 'National Security Strategy of the United States' issued by the White House and personally signed by George Bush, Sr.:
"In the Gulf, we saw the United Nations playing the role dreamed of by its founders... I hope history will record that the Gulf Crisis was the crucible of the new world order."

SOURCE: 'The Insiders - Architects of the New World Order' - by John McManus (to order, call 1-920-749-3784)

In my opinion, the policies and practices of George W. Bush (his 'fruit' as an elected official) has made him an enemy of your and your children's family, faith, and freedom. Please church, wake up ! [only support candidates for Congress who will co-sponsor the Right to Life Act (H.R.2763) and the bill to get the U.S. out of the U.N. ! (H.R.1146) in the Nov. 2002 elections] - Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary


Is Bush the Antichrist?

By Chuck Baldwin

April 12, 2002

During the eight years of Clinton's presidency, I was repeatedly asked, "Chuck, do you think Bill Clinton is the antichrist?" (Of course, I answered no.) Therefore, it is more than interesting to me that since G.W. Bush became president no one has asked if I thought he was the antichrist. Not one single person! Instead, many people attribute to Bush god-like qualities, which actually makes him a better candidate than Clinton was.

You see, one of the chief characteristics of the coming antichrist is that he appears "as an angel of light." Therefore, an obvious reprobate such as Bill Clinton is immediately disqualified. The antichrist, by very definition, is a master deceiver. He must be someone who appears as good and benevolent. The bite is in his tail not in his tongue. In reality, Bush's angelic persona makes him much more dangerous than bad boy Billy.

For example, while Clinton was in the process of appointing numerous homosexual activists to his administration, copious letters from Christian leaders such as Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and D. James Kennedy flooded America's Christian community. Appeals for protest and resistance were heard from pulpits throughout the country. A massive media campaign began against Clinton.

Today, however, President Bush is in the process of copying Clinton's numerous appointments of open homosexuals to high positions of government, but there are no letters, no warnings from pulpits, and no media campaigns opposing it. Just the opposite. Bush is being defended, lauded, and glorified for everything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or unscriptural it might be.

When Clinton only talked of legalizing embryonic stem cell research, he was castigated and condemned. Bush actually made the procedure legal, and yet, he was praised and honored. Clinton was denigrated when he tried to convince Israel to give up land for peace. Now, Bush is in the process of actually trying to create an independent Palestinian state for Israel's enemies (with Jerusalem as its capital, no less), yet continues to receive glowing adulation. If Clinton even suggested that America's immigration laws might need to be liberalized, he was denounced in the harshest terms; but Bush can actually grant limited amnesty to thousands of illegal aliens, and there is not the faintest whisper of protest.

Do you recall how Clinton was criticized for the "low lifes" he invited to the White House? Well, Bush recently invited wild man rocker, Ozzie Osbourne, to the White House. Have you heard any notable Christian leader take Bush to task for that?

You remember Ozzie Osbourne, don't you? He is the former front man for the heavy metal band, Black Sabbath. He is famous for stage antics such as biting the heads off birds and bats. His abuse of drugs and alcohol are also well known. Furthermore, Ozzie Osbourne desecrated The Alamo by pissing all over it. In spite of this, George W. Bush is said to be one of Osbourne's biggest fans. As such, Osbourne was recently invited to the White House for dinner. Have you heard any criticism of Bush for this?

Obviously, I do not believe President Bush is the antichrist any more than I believed Bill Clinton was. However, I do believe that Bush possesses more deceptive qualities than Clinton did and, therefore, is more dangerous. I also now understand more clearly how even "the elect" can be deceived. Bush' s acceptance by the overwhelming majority of Christian people proves the country is ready for the antichrist, whoever he is.



Thanks for the email, and thanks for listening.
Chuck Baldwin

NOTE:
These commentaries are published Tuesdays and Fridays and may not be reprinted or republished without permission. Editors or publishers interested in running these editorials, or Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an interview may contact chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com.

To learn more about my radio talk show please visit my web site at www.chuckbaldwinlive.com. When responding, please include your name, city and state.

Chuck Baldwin's Bio

Printer Friendly Version

Previous Articles by Chuck Baldwin





Discuss this and other topics at our discussion forum.

Untitled

          Produced by JSager Web Designs